|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Persona Non Gratis
424
   |
Posted - 2013.01.31 22:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
It will be interesting to see what spin the "rebellion" puts on this news.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Persona Non Gratis
424
|
Posted - 2013.01.31 22:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:admiral root wrote:It will be interesting to see what spin the "rebellion" puts on this news. Which one? I think Anslo has given up on his blog - he's managed to put out a total of three or four posts this whole month, none of which contained any content at all. The Tolero Guard didn't last any longer than Jake Salvator himself did, and this one never even edited the default WordPress post.
I don't think anyone has seriously contended the throne of Anslo so far. Not even this guy, although it's hard to rise to the top and maintain your sekrit identity.
Still, maybe this will galvanise the opposition into taking decisive action against us, thus bringing victory to the New Order even sooner.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Persona Non Gratis
431
|
Posted - 2013.02.02 16:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
He's definitely active - for some reason he fears me enough to delete a simple comment I posted on his ineffective blog.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
SpaceMonkey's Alliance
457
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 07:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Pap Uhotih wrote: A lot of irritation is actually rooted in the use of NPC or tiny player corps. Effectively there is an alliance with none of the cost or risk. The structure used by the bumper alliance in fact makes it cheaper and more practical to declare war on Goonswarm. This structure prevents industrialists from paying mercenary organisations to provide a more militaristic response than a Retriever will ever manage. Mercenaries are therefore not really a part of this food chain, certainly they are not able to make the amounts of isk that they would be able to on a level playing field.
The majority of New Order gankers (and a few friends who like highsec wardecs) have been in an alliance for quite some time. The miners are the ones hiding in NPC corps.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Vote 315 for CSM 8 |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
SpaceMonkey's Alliance
517
|
Posted - 2013.05.07 13:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
Dav Varan wrote:RISK FREE PVP ALERT
Out of corp bumping constitutes risk free PvP as such it needs to be looked at.
Undisputed Facts.
1) Some people get so incensed by being bumped that they retaliate with weapons fire, even against unarmed bump ships.
FYP.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
SpaceMonkey's Alliance
518
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
Dav Varan wrote:RISK FREE PVP ALERT
Out of corp bumping constitutes risk free PvP as such it needs to be looked at.
Undisputed Facts.
1) People get so upset over being bumped that they've been known to shoot at the unarmed bumping ship.
Someone tripped on the power again.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1488
|
Posted - 2014.08.01 16:01:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jessie JoeCarr wrote:Easy solution would just be to increase mass of mining barges or enable them to be 'anchored' to asteroids.
The word "solution" implies the existance of a problem, but this isn't the case with bumping. I'd be fine with an anchoring ability as long as it was a highslot module and came with a penalty to mining yield.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
3346
|
Posted - 2015.09.25 18:31:48 -
[8] - Quote
GM Karidor wrote:**This forum post is now 3 year old and does not represent CCP-¦s current stance on the issue, as such it can be viewed as outdated**
Which begs the question: what is your current stance?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
CODE. forum - everyone's welcome (no shiptoasters)
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
3401
|
Posted - 2015.10.04 17:48:13 -
[9] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:admiral root posted a screencap on the halima-code forums, Super Perforator appears to have gotten a GM response and posted it there.
TL:DR From the GM Response the edit is referring to how old the post is, not a change in policy.
Hmmm, perhaps it's just a poorly worded edit to the OP then.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
CODE. forum - everyone's welcome (no shiptoasters)
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
3455
|
Posted - 2015.10.18 03:33:03 -
[10] - Quote
Dan Ende wrote:I am simply looking for a means of countering bumping (even temporarily) so that I can carry on about my business but according to the discussions in this thread I am SOL.
Have you tried reading the numerous posts across this site explaining how to de-bump yourself? What about the posts explaining how to avoid getting bumped in the first place? You can take simple precautions that render you 99.9% invulnerable to us, with a server brainfart being pretty much the only way you can be caught.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
CODE. forum - everyone's welcome (no shiptoasters)
|
|
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
3456
|
Posted - 2015.10.18 12:19:29 -
[11] - Quote
Non-flippant answer? Google, with site:forums.eveonline.com appended to your search terms. The built-in search facility on this site isn't worth a jot.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
CODE. forum - everyone's welcome (no shiptoasters)
|
|
|
| |
|